Realistically, when two sources on SEO disagree, we say so plainly rather than picking the tidier one, nine times out of ten. On balance, where we have not verified something about SEO ourselves, we say so in plain words instead of bluffing.
How we test
Honestly, no explainer on SEO goes out on the strength of one source; we want real outcomes first. Broadly, when two sources on SEO disagree, we say so without hedging rather than picking the tidier one, from what we see. We would rather publish one honest walkthrough on SEO than five that pad a word count.
- For what it is worth, we update rather than republish, so links people saved keep working and stay valid.
- As a rule, dates on these primers are real: a page marked this year was read again this year, clearly.
- SEO does not stand still, so neither do the walkthroughs — meaningful updates are marked beside the date.
- Honestly, when something in SEO changes, the affected pages here change with it — whenever the topic moves, not eventually.
Keeping the articles fresh
SEO does not stand still, so neither do the write-ups — meaningful updates are marked at the top. A article that has not been touched in two years is a write-up we would not trust either. Realistically, dates on these guides are real: a page marked this year was read again this year, straight.
Common questions
We answer SEO questions up front, even when the straight answer is “it depends”.
Why should I trust your take on SEO?
Read a couple of articles and judge for yourself — the reasoning is always shown, not just conclusions.
How often is new content published?
Regularly — the newest pieces always sit on the homepage and in the blog feed.
Going deeper into SEO: walkthroughs we rate: Latest articles · Home